Question first
Methods and evidence are judged against a clearly framed population, exposure, comparator, outcome and decision context.
Research and scientific affairs
The Association supports rigorous nutrition research, responsible interpretation and transparent translation of evidence into standards, professional resources and public information.

Scientific principles
Methods and evidence are judged against a clearly framed population, exposure, comparator, outcome and decision context.
Design, conduct, measurement, analysis, bias, transparency and reproducibility inform the weight assigned to findings.
Interpretation addresses consistency, precision, applicability, limitations and credible alternative explanations.
Funding, affiliations and other interests are disclosed and managed; they do not substitute for examination of methods and evidence.

Scientific activity
Scientific communication
Association publications distinguish findings, interpretation, recommendation and uncertainty. Absolute language is avoided where evidence is conditional, evolving or population-specific.
Correction or withdrawal is undertaken where a material error, undisclosed conflict, invalidated evidence or changed technical position affects the reliability of an official output.
Scientific engagement
Proposals should state the question, public relevance, proposed method, participants, resources and material interests.